Bird Flu? What do we care?

[Old Codger]

Bird Flu? What do we care?
Posted: 25 February 2008

http://tinyurl.com/yp7ksu
The Cattistock Foxhounds have been caught on film behaving in a manner
which can only be described as grossly irresponsible by the League.
Our monitors filmed members of the hunt drawing hounds through
reedbeds at Abbotsbury Swannery, an area which is currently under bird
flu restrictions.

The restrictions were placed on the area following the discovery of a
number of dead swans. Fears have now arisen that the disease will be
at risk of spreading with the presence of a pack of hounds in the
area.

Paul Tillsley, League Operations Manager said, “In taking their hounds
through an area which is subject to bird flu restrictions the
Cattistock Foxhounds are behaving in a manner which is grossly
irresponsible. It is one thing that they think they can disregard the
laws on hunting but the fact they are willing to put the health of
people and animals at risk so they can continue with their so called
sport simply beggars belief. I am sure DEFRA will be investigating
this serious breach of regulations.”

[Old Codger]

Old Codger wrote:

Nowt. It's a Pete the troll cut and paste and never mind the
copyright forgery.

Post by Old Codger
Bird Flu? What do we care?
Posted: 25 February 2008
National Trust Bows to League Pressure
Posted: 26 February 2008
Hunt Hounds Brought to Order
Posted: 04 March 2008
Hunts banned from Commission land
Posted: 05 March 2008
Macca’s shrine to Linda desecrated by poacher
Posted: 11 March 2008

Five forged posts in three minutes between 2037 and 2040.

As Pete never reads what he posts and desires only to provoke
argument it is safest to assume that anything he espouses is
at least unsafe and probably malicious.

[Oh No]

Post by Old Codger
Five forged posts in three minutes between 2037 and 2040.

which we would never even see if you could just make yourself shut up.

Post by Old Codger
As Pete never reads what he posts and desires only to provoke
argument it is safest to assume that anything he espouses is
at least unsafe and probably malicious.

No one with any intellect reads his posts, or even sees them. If you
continue responding, expect a place with him in the kill file.

Regards
--
Charles Francis
moderator sci.physics.foundations.
charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
braces)

http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex

[Old Codger]

Post by Oh No

Post by Old Codger
Five forged posts in three minutes between 2037 and 2040.

which we would never even see if you could just make yourself shut up.

If you have him killfiled you still haven't seen his posts, just the odd
line from each post referenced.

Post by Oh No

Post by Old Codger
As Pete never reads what he posts and desires only to provoke
argument it is safest to assume that anything he espouses is
at least unsafe and probably malicious.

No one with any intellect reads his posts, or even sees them. If you
continue responding, expect a place with him in the kill file.

You expect me to permit Pete to post in my name, without comment from
me, defamatory material, copyright material, pure rubbish and personal
details of other posters just to avoid your kill file?

[Old Codger]

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:06:49 +0000, Old Codger

Post by Old Codger

Post by Oh No

Post by Old Codger
Five forged posts in three minutes between 2037 and 2040.

which we would never even see if you could just make yourself shut up.

If you have him killfiled you still haven't seen his posts, just the odd
line from each post referenced.

That's the point. No one cares Todger so just shut up you senile tart!

Post by Old Codger

Post by Oh No

Post by Old Codger
As Pete never reads what he posts and desires only to provoke
argument it is safest to assume that anything he espouses is
at least unsafe and probably malicious.

No one with any intellect reads his posts, or even sees them. If you
continue responding, expect a place with him in the kill file.

You expect me to permit Pete to post in my name,

It may well come as some surprise to you old chap but *Old Codger* is
not your name!! LOL gosh you do have this obsessive stalking lark bad
don't you!

Post by Old Codger
without comment from
me, defamatory material, copyright material, pure rubbish and personal
details of other posters just to avoid your kill file?

Ah I see. So your like an oxymoron bully defending the honor of the
bullies. Have I got it right? The rest of us just think you're the
moron part.

You've tried kissing arse. You've tried licking arse. You've even
tried to join in civil debate and failed like a blubbering mess. Give
it up Todger, face it, you're just a failure.

I like the name Old Codger it suits me. It's now mine. The fact that
it annoys you is just a bonus.

[Old Codger]

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:06:49 +0000, Old Codger

Post by Old Codger

Post by Oh No

Post by Old Codger
Five forged posts in three minutes between 2037 and 2040.

which we would never even see if you could just make yourself shut up.

If you have him killfiled you still haven't seen his posts, just the odd
line from each post referenced.

Post by Oh No

Post by Old Codger
As Pete never reads what he posts and desires only to provoke
argument it is safest to assume that anything he espouses is
at least unsafe and probably malicious.

No one with any intellect reads his posts, or even sees them.

That's no way to treat fellow UBA members even though in the main I
must agree they do lack a certain something. I wonder was the comment
aimed at any one in particular, Oz. Jim, Jill, David, Howard,
Steve.......?

Post by Old Codger
If you

Post by Oh No
continue responding, expect a place with him in the kill file.

You expect me to permit Pete to post in my name, without comment from
me, defamatory material, copyright material, pure rubbish and personal
details of other posters just to avoid your kill file?

[Old Codger]

Old Codger wrote:

No, not one of my posts. A genuine Pete the troll forgery, as is the
previous post in this thread at 0739.

Post by Old Codger
That's no way to treat fellow UBA members even though in the main I
must agree they do lack a certain something. I wonder was the comment
aimed at any one in particular, Oz. Jim, Jill, David, Howard,
Steve.......?

As Pete never reads what he posts and desires only to provoke
argument it is safest to assume that anything he espouses is
at least unsafe and probably malicious.